JavaScript Async Await Not Working with forEach Loop - Complete Fix Guide

The forEach loop in JavaScript doesn't work with async/await the way you might expect. This is one of the most common pitfalls developers encounter when working with asynchronous code.

Why forEach Doesn't Work with Async/Await #

The forEach method doesn't wait for promises to resolve. It executes all iterations simultaneously without waiting for the previous ones to complete.

Here's the problematic code:

// ❌ This doesn't work as expected
const urls = ['url1', 'url2', 'url3'];

async function fetchData() {
  console.log('Starting...');
  
  urls.forEach(async (url) => {
    // This runs immediately for all URLs
    const response = await new Promise(resolve => 
      setTimeout(() => resolve(`Data from ${url}`), 1000)
    );
    console.log(response);
  });
  
  console.log('Done!'); // This prints before the async operations complete
}

fetchData();

Solution 1: Use for...of Loop (Recommended) #

The for...of loop properly handles async/await and processes items sequentially:

// ✅ Sequential processing with for...of
const urls = ['url1', 'url2', 'url3'];

async function fetchDataSequential() {
  console.log('Starting sequential...');
  
  for (const url of urls) {
    const response = await new Promise(resolve => 
      setTimeout(() => resolve(`Data from ${url}`), 1000)
    );
    console.log(response);
  }
  
  console.log('Done!');
}

fetchDataSequential();

Solution 2: Use Promise.all() for Parallel Processing #

When you want all operations to run in parallel but wait for all to complete:

// ✅ Parallel processing with Promise.all
const urls = ['url1', 'url2', 'url3'];

async function fetchDataParallel() {
  console.log('Starting parallel...');
  
  const promises = urls.map(async (url) => {
    const response = await new Promise(resolve => 
      setTimeout(() => resolve(`Data from ${url}`), 1000)
    );
    return response;
  });
  
  const results = await Promise.all(promises);
  results.forEach(result => console.log(result));
  
  console.log('Done!');
}

fetchDataParallel();

Solution 3: Use Traditional for Loop #

For more control over the iteration process:

// ✅ Traditional for loop with async/await
const urls = ['url1', 'url2', 'url3'];

async function fetchDataTraditional() {
  console.log('Starting traditional loop...');
  
  for (let i = 0; i < urls.length; i++) {
    const response = await new Promise(resolve => 
      setTimeout(() => resolve(`Data from ${urls[i]}`), 1000)
    );
    console.log(`${i + 1}: ${response}`);
  }
  
  console.log('Done!');
}

fetchDataTraditional();

Solution 4: Use reduce() for Complex Sequential Operations #

When you need to pass results between iterations:

// ✅ Using reduce for sequential operations with data passing
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4];

async function sequentialSum() {
  console.log('Starting sequential sum...');
  
  const result = await numbers.reduce(async (promiseAcc, current) => {
    const acc = await promiseAcc;
    
    // Simulate async operation
    const processed = await new Promise(resolve => 
      setTimeout(() => resolve(current * 2), 500)
    );
    
    console.log(`Processing ${current}, result: ${processed}`);
    return acc + processed;
  }, Promise.resolve(0));
  
  console.log(`Final sum: ${result}`);
  return result;
}

sequentialSum();

Solution 5: Create a Custom asyncForEach Function #

If you prefer the forEach syntax, create a custom implementation:

// ✅ Custom asyncForEach implementation
Array.prototype.asyncForEach = async function(callback) {
  for (let i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
    await callback(this[i], i, this);
  }
};

const items = ['item1', 'item2', 'item3'];

async function useCustomForEach() {
  console.log('Starting custom forEach...');
  
  await items.asyncForEach(async (item, index) => {
    const result = await new Promise(resolve => 
      setTimeout(() => resolve(`Processed ${item}`), 800)
    );
    console.log(`${index + 1}: ${result}`);
  });
  
  console.log('Done with custom forEach!');
}

useCustomForEach();

Best Practices #

Use for...of for sequential processing when order matters
Use Promise.all() for parallel processing when order doesn't matter
Never use forEach with async/await - it won't wait
Consider performance - parallel is faster but uses more resources
Handle errors properly with try/catch blocks

Quick Reference #

Method	Sequential	Parallel	Use Case
`for...of`	✅	❌	Order matters, one-by-one processing
`Promise.all()`	❌	✅	Fast execution, all at once
`forEach`	❌	❌	Don't use with async/await
`reduce()`	✅	❌	Need to pass data between iterations

Choose the right method based on whether you need sequential or parallel processing for your specific use case.

JsGuide

JsGuide

JavaScript Async Await Not Working with forEach Loop - Complete Fix Guide

JavaScript Async Await Not Working with forEach Loop - Complete Fix Guide

Why forEach Doesn't Work with Async/Await #

Solution 1: Use for...of Loop (Recommended) #

Solution 2: Use Promise.all() for Parallel Processing #

Solution 3: Use Traditional for Loop #

Solution 4: Use reduce() for Complex Sequential Operations #

Solution 5: Create a Custom asyncForEach Function #

Best Practices #

Quick Reference #

Tags

Related Error Solutions

Why Does My JavaScript Async Await Function Return Promise Pending

Why Does My JavaScript Async Await Return Promise Pending?

Async/Await and Promise Errors - Complete Troubleshooting Guide

Common JavaScript Errors and How to Fix Them